Hello Krasimir, Friday, February 20, 2009, 11:00:30 AM, you wrote:
> and this is exactly what we get. I bet that if the original function was: well, you check this yourself! :) -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[email protected] _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
