Hello Krasimir,

Friday, February 20, 2009, 11:00:30 AM, you wrote:

> and this is exactly what we get. I bet that if the original function was:

well, you check this yourself! :)


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com

_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to