Hello Simon, Thursday, March 12, 2009, 1:29:56 AM, you wrote:
> For implementation, there are two routes. Either totally built-in, > or using a Core-to-Core plug-in. The thing I like about the latter > is that it can be done without having GHC HQ in the critical path, > because we (I) tend to slow things down, being a uniprocesor. We > don't have the plug-in capability yet, but I'm encouraging Max to > polish it up so that we do. I think it'd be a very valuable facility. as GHC popularity grows, it may become more profitable to spend resources making it more open, pluggable "compiler factory" rather than doing everything yourself -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
