| Analogously, is
|
| | > do { a <- getChar
| | > ; rec { b <- f c
| | > ; c <- g b }
| | > ; putChar c
| | > ; return b }
|
| equivalent to
|
| | > do { a <- getChar
| | > ; rec { b <- f c
| | > ; c <- g b } in do
| | > { putChar c
| | > ; return b }
No, there is no
rec { ss } in e
form; nor should there be since rec { ss } is monadic.
| Is
|
| | > do { rec { b <- f c
| | > ; c <- g b }
| | > ; putChar c
| | > ; return b }
|
| equivalent to
|
| | > rec { b <- f c
| | > ; c <- g b } in do
| | > { putChar c
| | > ; return b }
No. Same answer.
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
