You could also have a look at the new 'Gold' linker that's part of binutils. Not sure if this has been tested before with ghc but its meant to have far greater performance (in time is what I've heard, not sure about memory) then 'ld' and be a drop in replacement.
On 17 April 2010 00:00, Roman Beslik <ber...@ukr.net> wrote: > Hi. > This is not strictly a GHC question. I observed that "ld" when linking > GHC-compiled programs eats 0.5 GB of resident memory. ~3 times more than GHC > or Haddock. So if there is not enough free memory "ld" uses virtual memory > and works very slowly (practically does not use CPU). I'd like to know, is > anyone interested in researching and improving memory usage? Is it "ld" or > GHC problem? I found a similar discussion here > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/66189 > but it was too broad and went nowhere. > > -- > Best regards, > Roman Beslik. > > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users > _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
