On 16/07/2010 14:04, Axel Simon wrote:
Hi Simon,

On 16.07.2010, at 14:29, Simon Marlow wrote:

On 16/07/2010 12:36, Axel Simon wrote:
Dear Haskell maintainers,

I've progressed a little and found that the problem is down to
accessing global variables that are declared in dynamic libraries. In
a nutshell, this doesn't as the addresses of these global variables
are all wrong when ghci is executing the code. So, I think I hit:

http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/781

I was able to work around this problem by compiling the C modules with
-fPIC. This bug is pretty bad, I'd say. I've added myself to its CC
list.

Urgh. It's a nasty bug, but not one that we can fix, because it's an
artifact of the small memory model used on x86_64. The only fix is to
use -fPIC.

It might be possible to use -fPIC either by default, or perhaps just
for .c files and when compiling data references from FFI declarations
in Haskell code, that's something we could look into. We might want
-fPIC on by default anyway if we switch to using dynamic linking by
default (but we're not yet sure what ramifications that will have).


Well, my fix is:

if arch(x86_64)
cc-options: -fPIC

This only affects the C files we compile of which there are only two at
the moment. I am happy with this solution since I know which files are
affected.

But basically this bug will hit me whenever I use a global C variable
from within Haskell? I hope there are none that we use, they should all
be accessed using functions, so we should be safe.

A reference to data that resides in a shared library, yes. It's surprising how rarely this happens in fact.

Cheers,
        Simon



Cheers,
Axel



Cheers,
Simon



Cheers,
Axel

On 14.07.2010, at 16:51, Axel Simon wrote:

Hi all,

I'm trying to debug a segfault relating to the memory management in
Gtk2Hs. Rather than make you read the ticket
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/gtk2hs/ticket/1183
, I'll describe the problem:

- compiler 6.12.1 or 6.12.3
- darcs head of Gtk2Hs with #define DEBUG instead of #undef DEBUG in
gtk/Graphics/UI/Gtk/General/hsthread.c
- platform Ubuntu Linux, x86-64
- to reproduce: cd gtk2hs/gtk/demo/hello and run ghci World.hs and
type 'main'

A window with the "Hello World" button appears. After a few seconds,
the GC runs and the finaliser of the GtkButton is run since the
Haskell program no longer holds a reference to that object (only the
GtkWindow in C land has).

Thus, the GC calls a C function gtk2hs_g_object_unref_from_mainloop
which is supposed to enqueue the object into a global data structure
from which objects are later taken and g_object_unref is called on
them.

This global data structure is protected by a mutex, which is
acquired using g_static_mutex_lock:

void gtk2hs_g_object_unref_from_mainloop(gpointer object) {

int mutex_locked = 0;
if (threads_initialised) {
#ifdef DEBUG
printf("acquiring lock to add a %s object at %lx\n",
g_type_name(G_OBJECT_TYPE(object)), (unsigned long)
object);
printf("value of lock function is %lx\n",
(unsigned long)
g_thread_functions_for_glib_use.mutex_lock);
#endif
g_rand_new();
#if defined( WIN32 )
EnterCriticalSection(&gtk2hs_finalizer_mutex);
#else
g_static_mutex_lock(&gtk2hs_finalizer_mutex);
#endif
mutex_locked = 1;
}
[..]

The program prints:

acquiring lock to add a GtkButton object at 22d8020
value of lock function is 0
zsh: segmentation fault ghci World

Now the debugging weirdness starts. Whatever I do, I cannot get gdb
to find the symbol gtk2hs_g_object_unref_from_mainloop.

Since the function above is contained in a C file that comes with
our Haskell library, I tried to add "cc-options: -g" and "cc-
options: -ggdb -O0", but maybe somewhere symbols are stripped. So I
added the bogus function call to "g_rand_new()" which is not called
anywhere else and gdb stops as follows:

acquiring lock to add a GtkButton object at 2105020
value of lock function is 0
[Switching to Thread 0x7ffff41ff710 (LWP 15735)]

Breakpoint 12, 0x00007ffff115bfa0 in g_rand_new () from /usr/lib/
libglib-2.0.so

This all seems reasonable, but:

(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff115bfa0 in g_rand_new () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so
#1 0x00000000419b3792 in ?? ()
#2 0x00007ffff678f078 in ?? ()

i.e. the calling context is broken. I'm very, very sure that the
caller is indeed the above mentioned function and since g_rand_new
isn't called anywhere in my Haskell program (and otherwise the
calling context would be sane).
I'm also passing the address of gtk2hs_g_object_unref_from_mainloop
as FinalizerPtr to all my ForeignPtrs, so there is no inlining going
on.

Back to the culprit, the call to g_static_mutex_lock. This is a
macro that expands to

*g_thread_functions_for_glib_use.mutex_lock

where g_thread_functions_for_glib is a global variable that contains
a lot of function pointers. At the break point, it contains this:

(gdb) print g_thread_functions_for_glib_use
$33 = {mutex_new = 0x7ffff0cd9820<g_mutex_new_posix_impl>,
mutex_lock = 0x7ffff6c8b3c0<__pthread_mutex_lock>,
mutex_trylock = 0x7ffff0cd97b0<g_mutex_trylock_posix_impl>,
mutex_unlock = 0x7ffff6c8ca00<__pthread_mutex_unlock>,
mutex_free = 0x7ffff0cd9740<g_mutex_free_posix_impl>,
[..]

So the call to g_mutex_lock should call the function
__pthread_mutex_lock but it calls NULL.

I hoped that writing this email would give me a bit more insight
into the problem, but for now I suspect that something overwrites
either the stack or the code of the function.

On the same platform, the compiled version prints:

acquiring lock to add a GtkButton object at 1b05820
value of lock function is 7f7adcabd3c0
within mutex: adding finalizer to a GtkButton object!

On Mac OS or i386, using ghci or ghc, version 6.10.4, it works as
well.
Now for the fun bit: on i386 using ghci version 6.12.1 it works too.

So it's an x86-64 and ghc 6.12.1 bug. According to Christian Maeder
who submitted the ticket, the problem persists in 6.12.3.

Any hints and help appreciated,
Cheers,
Axel







_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Gtk2hs-devel mailing list
gtk2hs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk2hs-devel



_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to