You can emulate darcs's patch re-ordering in git if you put each independent sequence of patches on a separate branch. Then you can re-merge the branches in whatever order you want. This is a fairly common git workflow.
What happens after the merges? Does one maintain the branches somehow, or does one lose the (in-)dependency information? Claus _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
