On 21/02/2011 01:08, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
Excerpts from Tyson Whitehead's message of Sun Feb 20 07:14:56 -0500 2011:
I believe a back trace on the actual call stack is generally considered not
that useful in a lazy language as it corresponds to the evaluation sequence,
That is, it is demand centric while written code is production centric
Yeah, such a buffer wouldn't be very useful for end-users; I'm thinking more
in terms of going "backwards in time" for the STG execution.
Yes, that might be useful. However it would require compiling all the
libraries with that option too - so it would be an internal debug option
for use with a live GHC build, not something you could use with a
pre-built GHC (well, you could use it, but you wouldn't get traces for
library code).
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
