Thanks Daniel. I have just now built the 7.2.1 RC1 with integer-simple on CentOS 6 with the same failure.
It doesn't surprise me -- there is clearly something in my setup that is causing this problem. But it's good to get it confirmed -- thanks! Chris -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Fischer [mailto:daniel.is.fisc...@googlemail.com] Sent: 29 July 2011 22:02 To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org Cc: Chris Dornan Subject: Re: integer-simple On Friday 29 July 2011, 18:51:23, Chris Dornan wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I am still having difficulty getting a plain GHC build with > INTEGER_LIBRARY = integer-simple. (I outlined my problem here > yesterday > <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2011-July/0206 > 31 > .htm l> .) > RHEL 5 and 6 are very different development environments yet all my > attempts to build with a variety of source trees from 6.12.1 to 7.0.4 > with INTEGER_LIBRARY = integer-simple has ended here. There is clearly > something I am doing wrong! (Though it is difficult to see what.) > > Does anybody have any idea what could be causing this? > Not I, sorry. > > > Is anybody else doing integer-simple builds? > > It would be nice to get some info on the configurations that are > working. After your post yesterday, I built HEAD with integer-simple (build flavour perf, though, not quickest; openSuSE-11.4, x86_64; built with 7.0.4) and it worked [ghci and a few test programmes]. Maybe you should try building with GHC-7 (and different build flavours?). Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users