On 05/08/2011 12:08, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 05.08.2011, 09:46 +0100 schrieb Simon Marlow:
I don't like having to do this, but it reduces our testing surface (we
don't want to have to test against N different versions of libffi). I'm
quite happy for distros to build against their system libffi though, and
we should make that easier. Note that if you build against the system
libffi you are responsible for fully testing the combination (I know you
already do that, which is great).
after this broad hint, I ran the full testsuite, getting this result on
Debian:
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Fr 5. Aug 11:02:03 CEST 2011
2894 total tests, which gave rise to
12535 test cases, of which
0 caused framework failures
2327 were skipped
9823 expected passes
351 expected failures
1 unexpected passes
33 unexpected failures
Unexpected passes:
concurrent/should_run throwto002 (ghci)
Unexpected failures:
cabal ghcpkg05 [bad stderr] (normal)
concurrent/prog002 concprog002 [exit code non-0]
(threaded2,threaded2_hT)
concurrent/prog003 concprog003 [exit code non-0]
(normal,hpc,optasm,profasm,threaded1,threaded2,dyn,profthreaded)
concurrent/prog003 concprog003 [bad stdout or stderr] (ghci)
concurrent/should_run conc023 [exit code non-0]
(normal,hpc,optasm,profasm,threaded1,threaded2,dyn,profthreaded)
concurrent/should_run conc023 [bad stdout or stderr] (ghci)
ffi/should_run ffi009 [exit code non-0]
(normal,hpc,optasm,profasm,threaded1,threaded2,dyn,profthreaded)
ffi/should_run ffi009 [bad stdout or stderr] (ghci)
plugins plugins05 [exit code non-0]
(profasm,dyn,profthreaded)
Without looking into details yet, or comparing it with the test suite in
7.0.4.
This result is fine. Most of those failures have been cleaned up in
HEAD already, but the changes haven't been merged into the branch yet.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
