On 15/09/2011 14:03, Barney Hilken wrote:
As formulated on the wiki page, the "narrow issue" is a problem without a good
solution. The reason the community rejected TDNR is because it's basically polymorphism
done wrong. Since we already have polymorphism done right, why would we want it?
I think you mean "overloading", not "polymorphism", right?
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
