Simon, thank you! That makes sense then. I'd missed the fact that including the entire top-level scope requires the module to be interpreted. I suppose the "right" thing to do would be to not do that; but sadly, that seems to also mean that modules without a 'module Foo where' only export the single symbol 'main', and I liked the idea of students in my class not having to write out the module bit explicitly.
So I've been actually using interpreted code the whole time? If so, I suppose there's no loss in taking out HscAsm entirely, then! -- Chris _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
