On 09.10.2011, at 17:56, wagne...@seas.upenn.edu wrote: > Quoting Jean-Marie Gaillourdet <j...@gaillourdet.net>: > >> That sounds plausible. Do you see any workaround? Perhaps repeatedly >> evaluating typeOf? > > If there's a concurrency bug, surely the workaround is to protect calls to > the non-thread-safe function with a lock. > > typeOfWorkaround lock v = do > () <- takeMVar lock > x <- evaluate (typeOf v) > putMVar lock () > return x
Yes, but this workaround is in the IO monad while mine is not. Jean _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
