On 14/11/2011 14:47, Simon Marlow wrote: >> (1) Does Win32 need similar additions? I can't spot any substantial >> changes to it for Max's PEP383, but I'm not sure if any lower-level >> library changes might have affected it. > > No - Win32 file paths cannot by definition contain invalid Unicode. The > existing Win32 library is fine. > >> (2) What's the recommended way of doing the equivalent of >> getDirectoryContents for RawFilePath? Do we also need to add "raw" >> versins to the directory package? > > getDirectoryContents :: RawFilePath -> IO [RawFilePath] [...]
Thanks. One followup - in the Win32 case (where I guess we can still use the normal getDirectoryContents and get a FilePath), is it still necessary to re-encode the results to guarantee independence from the current settings (e.g. as proposed by Max in http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2011-November/021116.html), or do we just always get the original filename properly because of the way Windows handles paths? Sorry if all this is obvious but every time I think I understand Unicode I get proven wrong! Cheers, Ganesh _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
