On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones <simo...@microsoft.com>wrote:
> · **If String is not a kind level synonym for [Char], maybe it > should have a different name. For example, “foo” :: Label? Or Atom? > Or Symbol? The name is inspired by Ruby's :symbol notation. We could even use the same notation (seems unambiguous on the type level, no?). Even if we don't use the notation we could use the name. Sebastian
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
