On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Roman Leshchinskiy <r...@cse.unsw.edu.au> wrote: > On 17/02/2012, at 17:51, Johan Tibell wrote: >> All of the above. Put in other words: all fields whose final >> representation type could be the size of a pointer if we unpacked >> enough. > > Ok, that makes sense. I would include Double# and Int64# in this list. For > the simple reason that if the target audience are beginners they will have a > hard time figuring out why their programs run 20x faster with Float/Int than > with Double/Int64 instead of just 2x faster.
Makes sense to me. -- Johan _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users