On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the original type signature is needed to figure it out. In the > earlier example it indicated ghc drilling down into the type (a tuple) and > determining the strictness of the constituents.
I parenthesis were for tuples I would never expect to see e.g. U(L). _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
