On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Christopher Done <chrisd...@gmail.com> wrote: > I like \case as is proposed. It seems the least controversial one and > there's curry (\case ) for two-args, but even that seems a rare case. > > For what it's worth, I like the idea of omission being partiality, as > in case of and if then. It seems perfectly natural to me, I don't need > a \ to tell me that an expression will result in a function. But some > do. So I'll go along with and vote for \case. The lack of a lambda > case is one of the few "legitimate" complaints I have about Haskell's > syntax so it would be marvey to see it in GHC.
+1 for \case, I completely agree with Christopher Done. Cheers, -- Felipe. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users