Am Dienstag, den 10.07.2012, 08:53 +0100 schrieb Simon Marlow: > On 09/07/2012 17:32, Mikhail Vorozhtsov wrote: > > Would you still expect tuples for \case if you didn't see the way > > `case x, y of ...` was implemented (or thought that it is a > > primitive construct)? > > Yes, I still think it's strange. We don't separate arguments by > commas anywhere else in the syntax; arguments are always separated by > whitespace.
This is the point I wanted to make in my e-mail yesterday. Using a comma here seems to be against established Haskell syntax conventions. Best wishes, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
