On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Wolfgang Jeltsch <g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org> wrote: > If we use \case for functions, we should use proc case for arrows; > if we use \of for functions, we should use proc of for arrows. > > By the way, is proc a layout herald already?
No, proc is not a layout herald. The normal pattern is to use a do in the command part of the proc syntax, so it's do that introduces the layout. So "proc of" would fit in cleanly as a way to do proc with multiple patterns. Or "proc case", but again that's just a really ugly language wart, IMO uglier than just writing out the longhand version of "proc x -> case x of". -- Chris Smith _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users