On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Philip Holzenspies
<p...@st-andrews.ac.uk>wrote:

> So, there are many things people read in the proposal that I didn't want
> to put in, but the things I very much do want to include get lost in
> translation also. I wanted to allow the GHC source itself to be written in
> markdown.


If the existing source tree is using one form of markup, changes and
additions should really be consistent with what's already there instead of
introducing a new kind of markup.  This could actually be *more* disruptive.

-- 
brandon s allbery                                      allber...@gmail.com
wandering unix systems administrator (available)     (412) 475-9364 vm/sms
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to