On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Roman Cheplyaka <r...@ro-che.info> wrote:
> I find this discussion useful — there are some interesting points > (splitting "case of" into two parts) that I don't remember reading in the > original thread (but maybe it's just me). > Mentioned twice that I recall, as treating 'of' as a lambda and as '\of'. It got somewhat short shrift, likely because while it makes sense from an existing language syntax viewpoint, it makes little to none from a readability standpoint. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
