On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:38:04AM -0800, Johan Tibell wrote: > > Glad to see you're making progress on this. Once we're done exploring how > fine-grained we can make the division we might want to pull back a bit
I definitely agree with "Once we're done". Once we have made all the splits we might want to make, it'll be a lot easier to see the big picture and merge packages we decide should be merged. It's a lot harder to work the other way, as it's tricky to see what is or isn't possible. > In addition, I don't think we want to say that e.g. pure data structures > can't depend on the FFI. While their current implementation might not use > the FFI, what if we want to use it in the future. We'd have to reshuffle > the packages again. I think the issue is what a package exports, rather than what it depends on. Changing the package dependencies later won't affect users of the package. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users