likewise! just having that precise tagged info for how to pick a stable code state for ghc + associated libraries even if it wasn't a full "dev preview" release would make me a lot less conservative about using HEAD ghc more often / even as my default
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Conrad Parker <con...@metadecks.org> wrote: > On 20 March 2013 18:58, John Wiegley <jo...@fpcomplete.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Ian Lynagh <i...@well-typed.com> writes: > > > >> Would a 7.7.x recommended snapshot be useful to you? Tell us if you want > >> one. > > > > I think that could very useful, sort of like what the Linux kernel did > before > > they stopped. > > > > I'm never sure if building from HEAD will produce a compiler I should > use for > > getting real work done, but I wouldn't have the same reservations > concerning a > > 7.7.x "interim developer release". > > likewise. > > I'd be happy with just a git tag and an email to this list every month > or two indicating that there's a probably-ok version that could do > with some testing. This could happen whenever a feature lands and the > dust has settled a bit. > > Conrad. > > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users >
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
