On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones <simo...@microsoft.com>wrote:
> Does GND make sense in cases where the superclasses aren't also derived? > If I had a type T whose Ord instance made use of the Eq instance for some > reason, and then I made a newtype T' with a new Eq instance and a GND Ord > instance, the calls to (==) in the Ord instance will refer to the T > implementation, right?**** > > ** ** > > Yes, absolutely. **** > > class Show a => C a where**** > > op :: a -> a**** > > ** ** > > You might want to use GND for the (C Age) instance, but NOT use GND for > the Show instance. > Sure, but if op uses show internally, we get Int's show, not Age's, right? That seems correct, in that it's doing what GND is supposed to do, but I'll bet it will surprise people. -- Dave Menendez <d...@zednenem.com> <http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/>
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
