I'm unable to install the binary distribution of 7.8.1 on RHEL because it requires libgmp.so.10 and GLIBC_2.15, which are much greater than the version available on Red Hat. (I'm on a shared system without root access, so upgrading libc is out of the question, even if it could be done.) If this is what most users would like, I certainly don't want to be the Luddite trying to hold them back.
Who actually are "most users" for the bindist? Debian & derivatives have the latest GHC in the package repository, so it's presumably Red Hat & Co, and people without root. If the bindist is only relevant to rootless users on a modern Debian derived distro, is it targeting the right audience? -- View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/target-audience-for-the-binary-distribution-tp5743588.html Sent from the Haskell - Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
