On 2014-02-18 at 23:22:13 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 18.02.2014, 14:12 -0800 schrieb David Fox: >> It seems to me that the stm library that is supposed to be built into >> ghc-7.8.1 is missing. The deb provides and conflicts with >> libghc-stm-dev , but does not provide libghc-stm-dev-2.4.2.1-abcde. > > this seems to be the result of a possible inadvertent change in the GHC > source tarball creation: stm had been a "extra" lib already in 7.6 and > before, but was not part of the tarball. > > Herbert or Austin, is the sdist code not doing the right thing here?
Afaics, 'stm' is only used as an "extra" lib by testsuite (and only for one test-case) and nofib; therefore I don't think the GHC source tarball is supposed to contain 'stm'... _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
