I'd rather there be some textual finger print in the module itself that be be used to signal the literate format. But if there's a Case to be made in open to it I guess.
On Sunday, March 16, 2014, Joachim Breitner <m...@joachim-breitner.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Am Sonntag, den 16.03.2014, 13:56 +0100 schrieb Merijn Verstraaten: > > Cons: > > GHC would have to either maintain a possibly long of variants to look > for ([".hs", ".lhs", ".rst.lhs", ".md.lhs", ".svg.lhs", ".docx.lhs"]), > or look for "Foo.*.lhs". > > I’d find the latter acceptable, but it should be noted. > > Greetings, > Joachim > > -- > Joachim “nomeata” Breitner > m...@joachim-breitner.de <javascript:;> • > http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ > Jabber: nome...@joachim-breitner.de <javascript:;> • GPG-Key: > 0x4743206C > Debian Developer: nome...@debian.org <javascript:;> >
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
