On 2014-04-09 at 19:53:47 +0200, Conal Elliott wrote: > From a bit of experimentation, it appears that the problematic packages do > indeed have Haddock failures. For instance, > > bash-3.2$ cd random-1.0.1.1/ > bash-3.2$ cabal configure > Resolving dependencies... > Configuring random-1.0.1.1... > bash-3.2$ cabal haddock > Running Haddock for random-1.0.1.1... > Preprocessing library random-1.0.1.1... > Haddock coverage: > > System/Random.hs:2:2: parse error on input '#'
Fyi, this one specifically looks as if it could be related to https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/1740#issuecomment-39559026 I.e. caused by `clang -E` not being "semi-idempotent" (meaning the result from the second CPP pass can't be parsed anymore by GHC) _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users