On 13/05/14 15:04, John Meacham wrote:
Hi, I noticed that ghc now supports an 'AlternateLayoutRule' but am having trouble finding information about it. Is it based on my proposal and sample implementation? http://www.mail-archive.com/haskell-prime@haskell.org/msg01938.html
Yes it is, but I think we had to flesh it out with a few more cases. Ian will know more, he implemented it in GHC.
It has never been the default implementation, because it wasn't possible to cover 100% of the strange ways that code in the wild currently relies on the parse-error behaviour in the layout rule. You can get it with -XAlternateLayoutRule though.
I'm not sure what we should do about it. I think Ian's motivation was to experiment with a view to proposing it as a replacement for the layout rule in Haskell', but (and this is my opinion) I think it ends up not being as clean as we might have hoped, and the cases where it doesn't work in the same way as the old rule aren't easily explainable to people.
On the other hand, we did find a nice use for it in GHC: the multiline parser in GHCi can tell whether you've finished typing a complete expression using the alternate layout rule.
Cheers, Simon
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/AlternativeLayoutRule implies it has been in use since 6.13. If that is the case, I assume it has been found stable? I ask because I was going to rewrite the jhc lexer and would like to use the new mechanism in a way that is compatible with ghc. If it is already using my code, so much the better.
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
