You probably want to compile locally, e.g. with Vagrant, and then send the binary "into the cloud"
Tom El May 25, 2014, a las 2:36, harry <volderm...@hotmail.com> escribió: > Simon Marlow-7 wrote >> Is it just shortage of space, or is there anything else that pushes you >> towards DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS=NO? Isn't disk space cheap? > > Disc space is prohibitively expensive for zero-budget open source projects > deployed to the free tier of cloud computing providers. > > We typically get 1Gb for everything, including GHC, third-party libraries, > our own code, and data. A full install of GHC is nearly 1Gb by itself. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Future-of-DYNAMIC-GHC-PROGRAMS-tp5749793p5750165.html > Sent from the Haskell - Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
