How about CAN_OVERLAP? -- Krzysztof 29-07-2014 15:40, "Brandon Allbery" <allber...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Andreas Abel <andreas.a...@ifi.lmu.de> > wrote: > >> +1. I like Niklas' syntax better. Also OVERLAPPABLE is a horrible word, >> OVERLAPPING sound less formidable (even though it might be slightly less >> accurrate). > > > We already get "overlap ok" in instance-related type errors, so OVERLAP_OK > wouldn't be particularly alien even if it doesn't quite fit in with > existing pragmas. > > -- > brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine > associates > allber...@gmail.com > ballb...@sinenomine.net > unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad > http://sinenomine.net > > _______________________________________________ > Libraries mailing list > librar...@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries > >
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
