Mind you I'm just trying to come up with theories we can test, I'm not assigning blame. :)
I'm not sure how to do the apples to apples comparison, but it sounds like some sleuthing Is In order. I dont have a 7.10 setup yet, but if someone can put a tarballed dist build folder for a 7.10 and the same for 7.8 for some lib that blows up,I'm happy to try to dig i n. Or I'll get things setup later this week to do the full comparison locally. On Apr 1, 2015 11:12 AM, "Edward Z. Yang" <ezy...@mit.edu> wrote: > Yes, this does seem like a potential culprit, although > we did do some measurements and I didn't think it was too bad. > Maybe we were wrong! > > Edward > > Excerpts from Jeremy's message of 2015-04-01 07:26:55 -0700: > > Carter Schonwald wrote > > > How much of this might be attributable to longer linker symbol names? > Ghc > > > 7.10 object code does have larger symbols! Is there a way to easily > > > tabulate that? > > > > That would explain why the hi files have also increased many-fold. Is > there > > any way to avoid the larger symbols? > > > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users >
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users