On 2015-05-06 at 13:38:16 +0200, Jan Stolarek wrote: [...]
> Regarding licensing issues: perhaps we should simply ask Malcolm > Wallace if he would consider changing the license for the sake of GHC? > Or perhaps he could grant a custom-tailored license to the GHC > project? After all, the project page [1] says: " If that's a problem > for you, contact me to make other arrangements." Fyi, Neil talked to him[1]: | I talked to Malcolm. His contention is that it doesn't actually change | the license of the ghc package. As such, it's just a single extra | license to add to a directory full of licenses, which is no big deal. [1]: http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/351pur/rfc_native_xcpp_for_ghc_proposal/cr1e5n3 _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
