Best in the ticket https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11418#comment:27, I 
transferred your comment there

S

From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org] 
On Behalf Of Sven Panne
Sent: 16 February 2016 18:03
To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Subject: Re: [Feedback requested]: -fhelpful-import-errors

2016-02-16 18:12 GMT+01:00 Tom Sydney Kerckhove 
<syd.kerckh...@gmail.com<mailto:syd.kerckh...@gmail.com>>:
[...] As suggested by `thomie`, I created a design proposal at
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Proposal/HelpfulImportError
and am now looking for feedback.

[ Not sure if the feedback should be submitted here on in the corresponding 
ticket... ]

Just a few quick remarks:

   * Whatever you do, never walk the file system tree up or down in an 
uncontrolled way, this will kill basically all benefits and is a show-stopper. 
File systems like NFS, NTFS, stuff on USB sticks etc. are so *horribly* slow 
when used that way that the walks will probably dominate your compilation time. 
And even under Linux it's not uncommon to have a few dozen directory levels and 
hundreds of thousands of files below our cwd: Just check out a few 
repositories, have some leftovers from compilations, tons of documentations in 
small HTML files etc., and this sums up quickly. Git walks up the tree, but 
only looking for a specific directory and will e.g. not cross mount points 
under normal circumstances. This is probably the limit of what you can do.

   * Caching between runs will be tricky: How will you invalidate the cache? 
People can (and will :-) do all kinds of evil things between runs, so how can 
you (in-)validate the cache quicker than re-scanning the file system again?

   * As a general rule to keep in mind during the design: Successful compiler 
runs should not pay a price. It's OK if things are a little bit slower when an 
error occurs, but the main use case is successful compilation. This is a bit 
like exceptions in most programming language implementations: They are more or 
less for free when you don't use them (yes, they have a cost even then because 
they complicate/invalidate some compiler optimizations, but let's forget that 
for now), and are often costly when you actually raise them.

Just my 2c,
   S.
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to