Dear all, thanks for the many responses. It appears that this is now fixed. (no need to send more).
Cheers, Gershom On June 19, 2016 at 3:08:28 PM, Simon Peyton Jones via Glasgow-haskell-users (glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org) wrote: > Dear GHC devs/users > This is another test to see if email from me, relayed via Haskell.org, ends > up in your spam > folder. Gershom thinks he’s fixed it (below). Can I trespass on your patience > once more? > Just let me know if this email ends up in your inbox or spam. Can you cc John > and Gershom (but > perhaps not everyone else)? Thanks > Simon > > > | From: Gershom B [mailto:gersh...@gmail.com] > > | Sent: 18 June 2016 18:53 > > | To: Simon Peyton Jones ; John Wiegley > > | > > | Cc: Michael Burge > > | Subject: Re: FW: CMM-to-SAM: Register allocation weirdness > > | > > | Simon — I just found two possible sources of the problem (first: the top > > | level config didn’t take hold due to other errors when updating — fixed > that, > > | and second, it might be possible the top level config isn’t retroactively > > | applied to all lists — so i added the config to the relevant lists > directly). > > | > > | I think if you try one more time it might work (fingers crossed). > > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users > _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
