Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 07.07.2016, 13:15 -0400 schrieb Carter Schonwald:
> agreed -1,
> ambiguity is bad for humans, not just parsers.
>
> perhaps most damningly,
> > f do{ x } do { y }
>
> is just reallly really weird/confusing to me,It is weird to me, but in no way confusing under the simple new rules, and I am actually looking forward to using that, and also to reading code with that. In fact, everything I wanted to pass two arguments in do-notation to a function I felt at a loss. The prospect of itemizing multiple large arguments to a function by writing someFunctionWithManyArguments do firstArgument do second Argument which may span several lines do third Argument is actually making me happy! It feels like going from XML to YAML... Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: nome...@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nome...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
