Hi Christian, On 6 July 2016 at 16:08, C Maeder <chr.mae...@web.de> wrote: > Hi, > > allowing group A constructs (do, case, ...) and group B constructs (\, > let, if, ...) as parts of functions application (fexp) without extra > parentheses looks natural to me. The current state is an artificial and > unnecessary restriction. Style guides may dictate restrictions, but the > parser/language should not (without good reasons). > > So +1 for the proposal from me. > > However, I would not distinguish group A and group B constructs in the > proposed grammar rules. The report already states (for the group B > constructs): > "The grammar is ambiguous regarding the extent of lambda abstractions, > let expressions, and conditionals. The ambiguity is resolved by the > meta-rule that each of these constructs extends as far to the right as > possible."
This is a good point, I have updated the wiki page and simplified the grammar change. Thank you, Akio _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
