Done: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/13715#ticket
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:44 PM George Colpitts <george.colpi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I agree, will file a bug this evening. > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:26 AM Ben Gamari <b...@well-typed.com> wrote: > >> George Colpitts <george.colpi...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Hi Ben >> > >> > I built from source and ran the tests on my Mac and found some >> > problems. I'm not sure if the failing tests have been ran successfully >> > by others on this platform. I did "make slowtest". Maybe the problem >> > only happens on my machine. >> > >> Currently Harbormaster only runs `make test`, not `make slowtest`. >> Consequently, `slowtest` is generally rather broken, even on Linux. >> Every once in a while I look at it and try to pare down the failures, >> but it's an up-hill battle. >> >> > I'm new to running the testsuite and not sure how the sleep settings on >> my >> > computer affect long running computations. >> > >> > - If I want to run a long running test such as "make slowtest" >> overnight >> > will my computer go to sleep preventing the test from running? i.e. >> should >> > I invoke it with something like "caffeinate -i make slowtest" ? >> > >> That sounds right to me. >> >> > I almost didn't run the tests assuming they had been run as part of the >> > release process but then I guessed that maybe slowtest had not been >> run. It >> > would be a pain but would it be worth documenting which tests had been >> run >> > on which platforms? >> > >> I currently don't validate the binary distribution tarballs. Instead I >> judge validation state from Harbormaster's testing of the ghc-8.2 >> branch. >> >> Over the summer we intend on revamping our CI infrastructure, which >> should make it easier to do nightly runs of slowtest (and perhaps >> provide nightly or even per-commit binary distributions). >> >> > I assume I should file a bug for the following? >> > >> That would be great. I had a quick look at this and it looks quite >> likely that the simplifier is looping: even -fsimpl-tick-factor=1000 >> doesn't succeed. This looks like a real regression. >> >> Cheers, >> >> - Ben >> >>
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users