On Tue, Aug 10 2021, Simon Peyton Jones <simo...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> It's hard to tell what is happening without a repro case. Can you share one? Haven't been able to do that with <10MB of output, I'm afraid ... > You suggested that it might have something to do with using an > operator. Does the same thing happen if you replace the operator with > an alpha-numeric name? I've now concluded several things are coming together. As things started working with INLINE [0] instead of INLINE, it's not the symbolic name. First, reading the ghc source code suggests I can only have one -ddinline-check. Correct? Also, I'm guessing that the inlining I didn't see reported by -dinline-check happened inside the simplifier pass inserted by the ConCat plugin. (And hence INLINE [0] moved it out of that pass.) Is it possible that the flag isn't getting propagated there? (Sorry for being vague - if you don't know offhand, it's not worth digging without more info from me.) -- Regards, Mike _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
