Yeah, that's *just* what we need. More government interference in
private business. To quote Reagan, "more government isn't the
solution to the problem...more government *is* the problem."
I agree that monopolies are a bad thing (except for natural
monopolies) but my approach to ending them is the introduction of
viable alternatives. The online option is completely viable, and is
showing a growth rate that has them running scared.
Who, a year ago, would have believed that WalMart Optical would be
selling glasses for $38, or Sears Optical for $50? Those price points
are positioned to directly compete with the online sites...and both
stores are members of Luxottica.
-- Chuck Knight
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Glenn <[email protected]> wrote:
> How many of you here think what big corporations that control the
> insurance, frame making and sale of said frames is an "unfair trade
> practice"? I just have the impression that the "optical world" has
> gone completely unnoticed by Congress, FTC and other oversight
> groups. Anyone else agree???
>
> Not sure how to get a campaign started, but I'd like to share my
> thoughts with my Congress-person (not very eloquent when it comes to
> writing folks of power).
>
> --
> Check us out at the oft-updated http://glassyeyes.blogspot.com!
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GlassyEyes" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/glassyeyes?hl=en
>
> To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
>
--
Check us out at the oft-updated http://glassyeyes.blogspot.com!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"GlassyEyes" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/glassyeyes?hl=en
