On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:44 PM, EBo <[email protected]> wrote: > Personally, I think I prefer Anant's dev-plan9 layout as opposed to scattering > the ebuilds throughout the conventional gentoo portage categories, but I am > not sure what the best overall layout is. If we develop ebuilds for each of > the tools/libs (dev-plan9's layout), then we can manage each of the tools > separately and still have a plan9-meta, etc., similar to the way kde is > managed.
I'd go with putting all the ebuilds in dev-plan9 first, and as they mature think about meta-ebuilds like kde at a later point. > If it is OK with everyone, I'll contact Jorge Vicetto and gentoo regarding > integrating the different efforts, or at least make sure I'm not stepping on > anyone's toes. Please go ahead, and also ask for access to the overlay :-) Cheers, Anant -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/glendix?hl=en
