On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 12:23:38 -0700, Anant Narayanan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:06 AM, EBo <[email protected]> wrote:
>> While testing I found that kernel support for Plan 9 binaries fails to
>> compile due to number of arguments mismatch in the call to sys_clone in
>> plan9/syscalls.c.  Can anyone explain that?
> 
> It is quite likely that the kernel interface to clone() has changed.
> Again. The last known working kernel version we compiled against was
> 2.6.31. No doubt, we need an update. A fix should be trivial (most of
> the time they just shuffle arguments around), but I won't be sure
> until I take a look.

If you would take a look that would be great.  The interesting thing is
that the problem exists in 2.6.31 and 2.6.29 as well.  It might be a
problem with the new headers -- I'm running with linux-headers-2.6.30-r1

  EBo --

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/glendix?hl=en

Reply via email to