Le Mercredi 3 Mai 2006 10:28, Stéphane Magnenat a écrit :
> I prefer Sebastian's version, as it is very easy to understand and thus
> will help people enter into it. Not everyone is STL übergeek and, honestly,
> STL is very powerfull but not very userfriendly at first sight.
>
> As this printf thing will be used everywhere, having a simple object with
> this feature will surely compile faster than boost::format, which is a
> bonus.
I'm not sure to understand, you mean that instead of doing
FormatableString("Hello %s").arg("Beuss); we do something like
FormatableString &fs = FormatableString::getInstance();
fs.setString("Hello %s");
fs.arg("Beuss");
to avoid construction (I guess I'm wrong no ?)
>
> Do not understand me wrong, as I've written on the other thread, I'm not
> against boost. I just think this dependency problem should be addressed on
> a pragmatic basis and not on a religious one.
>
> Steph
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> glob2-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
_______________________________________________
glob2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
