> Hi, > > I've the feeling that we are suffering from our current release naming > scheme. > The asymptotic approach of 1.0 probably has a depressing effect. So here is a > suggestion (and it's only that, I'm interested in your opinions): why not > switching to a single int release naming, and treating all release as stable > ones?
You mean like glob2-1, glob2-2, glob2-3, ... ? Ok. That's mathematically and psychologically prettier. In a way we have two integers, because of the 2 in glob2. When we make a really big change we can go to glob3-1. Shall we do this on our next release or wait until Bradley finishes the network rewrite? Let's do it on our next release! >From a user point of view, a change in the graphics (like optional tiles by fede) will make a bigger impression then the network. So this would be a good time to change the naming scheme. -- Kai Antweiler _______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
