"Bradley Arsenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 4/16/07, Joe Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Not quite. I suggested the same change for two _different_ lines that >> used prevLevel. I think those two lines are still buggy. :-( > > I've actually looked into the logic of the other lines that use > prevLevel, and they are semantically correct. Its hard to put into > prespective at what levels of buildings particular functions where > called, but I quickly sorted it out in my head.
Thanks for the reassurance! > This happens to be part of one of those architectural problems with > Glob2 that I already discussed. The code works, but it isn't > maintainable. Indeed, sounds like a good motivation. -- Joe _______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
