Yes, the release cycle is weird. It seems pointless to me to have people download a tagged release then make version test those etc. Its just eaiser to download cvs, test, then if no problems, then tag and release all in one go (no RC).
But hey, its what some people want. And already in enough trouble with suggesting SVN so I don't wanna suggest removing RC :P
It's a release candidate for an alpha version. It is perfectly fine if > there are still issues, as long as they are fixed for the final > (alpha) release. If we go ahead with testing alpha RC, we will be soon > making pre-RC alpha releases and testing them... > > We are already doing a quite weird release life cycle: RC for alpha > releases. Let's not make it worse. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_stage _______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
-- Kieran.P http://qlwiki.linuxsolutions.co.nz/
_______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
