Alright. I just sent an email outlining some agreement terms (if this were to go ahead) asking that if this were to proceed, we (the current devs) would maintain complete control over the project, and they would not be able to commercialize or demand feature requests be implemented. That basically they provide art, sounds, and programing, in exchange for a link or advert somewhere in the game for a short period (and in the credits). And thats all.
Do you think that might be acceptable? (I'm just throwing ideas here, nothing is final, if you can think of more terms then fire away. The worst they can do is reject them :P ) Regards Kieran On 6/30/07, Stéphane Magnenat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I prefer staying independent. Indeed, up now contributors have work freely because they love the game. I think this is the right way to think. I don't like the "we help you and you become under our wing", because it means that we have contributors that work out of commercial interests (in this case our visibility and name). I think it has great risks both: - frustrating the normal contributors, - killing the freedom of decision in the development process that allows use to make a really original game even if that means few players on short term. Have a nice day, Steph -- http://stephane.magnenat.net _______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
-- Kieran.P http://qlwiki.linuxsolutions.co.nz/
_______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
