On 7/15/07, Leo Wandersleb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kieran P wrote: > Ok, so thats Nct, Brad, donkyhotay, Joe, and myself. Just the following > contributors from the past 3 months left. You would have to ask all contributors of the past 80 years. > Are you 5 for or against the > change to GPL v3 (putting aside any discussion, a simple yes or no will > do, and if you need to, "license the changes to glob2" as joe wells said > (and any futher ones if you would like to) so we can keep Globulation 2 > free, without restrictions in the future :P ) GPLv2 is fine, too. Maybe v3 is better for the good of OSS but there is one point I would vote to not switch to v3 for but rather take Affero GPL. Theoretically with GPLv3 it would be possible to make the yog server closed source. Hey that's a nice trick to generate money from all those peoples work that have contributed more than 3 months ago </sarcasm> Leo Wandersleb
I don't see what your talking about. We've never had to distribute the source code to the YOG server, we could have kept it 100% private and refused to give copies to people at request, in any GPL version, as long as we didn't send out server binaries to other people. GPL v3 doesn't affect us in this matter. -- Really. I'm not lieing. Bradley Arsenault.
_______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
