On Wednesday 26 November 2008 00:36:54 Kai Antweiler wrote: > > On Wednesday 26 November 2008 00:12:49 Kai Antweiler wrote: > >> You are absolutely right. We ignore the undering concept - as we often > >> do. We have only a hand full of active developers. Therefore it isn't > >> that bad. > >> > >> If some users already have those revisions locally (which is unlikely > >> because they aren't in the default branch), it won't hurt. > > > > As far as I know, updating or cloning the repository does clone > > everything. So > > this is not clean :-( > > I'm not sure, if you are really referring to the mail that you quote. > It is sad indeed that there is no definite way to clean the repository > of all users. > There can't be, because we don't have a central server concept - even > though we are using a central server.
As far as I know, all developer use hg.globulation2.org as if we had a central repository, so stripping there and asking people not to taint it with buggy version should be ok. hg.globulation2.org is my server so I can do the admin stuff. I would like to know the extent of the work done in splitting files and whether we can duplicate it easily, either by hand or by script. I really do not like this idea of keeping these ugly and useless object files forever. Have a nice day, Steph -- http://stephane.magnenat.net _______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
