Bradley Arsenault wrote: > All of these names seem a bit ridiculas. We should only have one > respitory, and that is the one for glob2, as the current glob2 code is > the only code we have. So glob2-new and glob2-old and all this other > stuff is just to get arround someones mistake, but a mistake shouldn't > permamently alter the names of our code respitories to something > unnatural and confusing.
mistakes can and will happen. dropping part of the history is no solution. what other problem apart from it not being fancy do you have? i mean practical problems? greetings, leo wandersleb _______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
